<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catechesis in the Catechumenate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rciablog.com/2008/08/catechesis-in-the-catechumenate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rciablog.com/2008/08/catechesis-in-the-catechumenate/</link>
	<description>A Free Tool Provided by the Association for Catechumenal Ministry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauline</title>
		<link>http://rciablog.com/2008/08/catechesis-in-the-catechumenate/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciablog.com/?p=88#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Thank you thank you thank you for the above article on the Standard of Teaching...., it is the first RCIA related article that mentions the intimacy of God, and that Lectionarybased catechesis is not suitable as the primary principle upon which to base the order of teachings!!! It sounds almost heretical to my experience, but is soooo true! Relating teachings in the manner described in the article sounds right on. thanks again 
Pauline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you thank you thank you for the above article on the Standard of Teaching&#8230;., it is the first RCIA related article that mentions the intimacy of God, and that Lectionarybased catechesis is not suitable as the primary principle upon which to base the order of teachings!!! It sounds almost heretical to my experience, but is soooo true! Relating teachings in the manner described in the article sounds right on. thanks again<br />
Pauline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

